Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaX4wZs=HgmToPbTn4jcHPC+rDrhLGteuWEW-vfx2tvtg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is possibility to introduce new compile option #option to disable plan
> cache on function scope. Do you think so it is acceptable solution? It is
> step forward.

You can already set a GUC with function scope.  I'm not getting your point.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: 'Bruce Momjian'
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan