Re: [Patch] Make block and file size for WAL and relations defined atcluster creation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [Patch] Make block and file size for WAL and relations defined atcluster creation
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaWsQM3youf=vNwH2tdJXaSJN2GNb47HFmt-SqLZe-dBw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Patch] Make block and file size for WAL and relations defined atcluster creation  (Remi Colinet <remi.colinet@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [Patch] Make block and file size for WAL and relations defined atcluster creation
Re: [Patch] Make block and file size for WAL and relations definedat cluster creation
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:43 PM, Remi Colinet <remi.colinet@gmail.com> wrote:
> Justifications are:

I think this is all missing the point.  If varying the block size (or
whatever) is beneficial, then having it configurable at initdb is
clearly useful.  But, as Andres says, you haven't submitted any
evidence that this is the case.  You need to describe scenarios in
which (1) a non-default blocksize performs better and (2) there's no
reasonable way to obtain the same performance improvement without
changing the block size.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: CFM for January commitfest?