Re: Initial Review: JSON contrib modul was: Re: Another swing at JSON - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Initial Review: JSON contrib modul was: Re: Another swing at JSON
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaUmjLMSzyMy9_p1QjY7iOS2mPBg-Cn=rULu7Xxk4c=OQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Initial Review: JSON contrib modul was: Re: Another swing at JSON  (Joey Adams <joeyadams3.14159@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Initial Review: JSON contrib modul was: Re: Another swing at JSON
Re: Initial Review: JSON contrib modul was: Re: Another swing at JSON
Re: Initial Review: JSON contrib modul was: Re: Another swing at JSON
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Joey Adams <joeyadams3.14159@gmail.com> wrote:
> On another matter, should the JSON type guard against duplicate member
> keys?  The JSON RFC says "The names within an object SHOULD be
> unique," meaning JSON with duplicate members can be considered valid.
> JavaScript interpreters (the ones I tried), PHP, and Python all have
> the same behavior: discard the first member in favor of the second.
> That is, {"key":1,"key":2} becomes {"key":2}.  The XML type throws an
> error if a duplicate attribute is present (e.g. '<a href="b"
> href="c"/>'::xml).

Hmm.  That's tricky.  I lean mildly toward throwing an error as being
more consistent with the general PG philosophy.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joey Adams
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial Review: JSON contrib modul was: Re: Another swing at JSON
Next
From: Jan Urbański
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial Review: JSON contrib modul was: Re: Another swing at JSON