Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaSHW6HcOMCD9jEyJ4tjVauaZJPRmfPOiYbD3GptQurxw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.6 -> 10.0  (Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net> wrote:
> So the first question needs to be not "When?" but "Should we?" Before that
> can be answered we need a list of TODO items that would break pg_upgrade as
> it exists today. Then some thought can be put into what it would take to
> support an in-place upgrade with those changes. MAYBE it turns out that it's
> just too much effort and we do need a break, but that needs to be a very
> well justified decision.

Well said.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0