On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> If we were sure that the kernel error was permanent, then this argument
>>> would be moot: the data is gone already. The scary thought here is that
>>> it might be a transient error, such as a not-always-repeatable kernel
>>> bug. In that case, zeroing the page would indeed lose data that had
>>> been recoverable before.
>
>> Yeah, and in fact I think that's probably not a terribly remote
>> scenario. Also, if you're running on dying hardware, you really do
>> NOT want to force the kernel to write a whole bunch of pages back to
>> the dying disk in the midst of trying to pg_dump it before it falls
>> over. You just want to read what you can of what's there now.
>
> Hm? zero_damaged_pages doesn't cause the buffer to be marked dirty,
> so I dunno where these alleged writes are coming from.
I'm not sure either, but I'm pretty sure I've seen at least one case
where turning it on caused a whole lotta data to disappear.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
