Re: Large number of open(2) calls with bulk INSERT into empty table - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Large number of open(2) calls with bulk INSERT into empty table
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaJAH0_7=DO8nm2yUDZCqoSf6B=UdTz=1VZSChH667C=Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Large number of open(2) calls with bulk INSERT into empty table  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Large number of open(2) calls with bulk INSERT into empty table
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> A TODO for this?

You mean this part?

>> On the other hand, the problem of the FSM taking up 24kB for an 8kB
>> table seems clearly worth fixing, but I don't think I have the cycles
>> for it at present.  Maybe a TODO is in order.

I certainly think that'd be worth a TODO.  Whether the rest of this is
worth worrying about I'm not sure.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Timing overhead and Linux clock sources
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: The pgrminclude problem