Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Should logtape.c blocks be of type long? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Should logtape.c blocks be of type long?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaJ=RMWNJbt5u1e2fgcV_A=K=PKQMc7nedS-DNK5kOVgA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Should logtape.c blocks be of type long?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Having said that, I'm not sure it's worth the trouble of changing.
> The platforms where there's a difference are probably not muscular
> enough that anyone would ever get past 16TB in a temp file anyhow.

Is this comment a reflection of your generally-low opinion about
Windows, or some specific limitation that I don't know about?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] error detail when partition not found
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Instability in select_parallel regression test