Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaHrLNdTE2H2thricOXYeOCwSedEoHYEvLpM357Fbb_dg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> So, I'm -1 on not having any keyword at all.  I have no objection
> to Merlin's proposal though.  I agree that PERFORM is starting to
> look a bit silly, since it doesn't play with WITH for instance.

Yeah, I think requiring PERFORM is stupid and annoying.  +1 for
letting people write a SELECT with no target.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql
Next
From: Abhijit Menon-Sen
Date:
Subject: Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'