Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaEQmQsiFqgFpxNjxvOsnL=4Fvj_rfQTi1e=mmO06zuuA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:35 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> It looks like it was not changed in all the places. make falied. I
> have fixed all the instances of these two functions in the attached
> patchset (only 0003 changes). Please check.

Oops.  Thanks.

I'm going to go ahead and commit 0001 here.  Any more thoughts on the rest?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v11