Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 7) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 7)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaDtzTC02gx2E_w1mh7eAaaJ_ONJadu0AQGUrgSMou8Kw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 7)  (Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 7)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss@gmail.com> wrote:
During this week, I read documentation and source code of BRIN index to understand its implementation.
But later I found out that it is unlikely to implement page level or tuple level predicate locking in BRIN index.
In this week, I also fixed a small issue and updated my previous patch for gin index. Currently, I am working on 
sp-gist index.

It's a shame that nobody seems to be answering emails like this, but you also haven't provided much detail here - e.g. *why* is BRIN unlikely to work out well?  I think I know the answer, but it'd be good to spell out your thoughts on the subject, I think.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] JSONB - JSONB operator feature request
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Increase Vacuum ring buffer.