Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we say "wal_level = logical" instead of "wal_level >= logical" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Should we say "wal_level = logical" instead of "wal_level >= logical"
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaDBoFCnwdWuP608q6ancveKAOkvwut0eX1L6oy6Eq48A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we say "wal_level = logical" instead of "wal_level >= logical"  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 3:20 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do you have thoughts about the patch?

I agree with the rationale that Ashutosh states but I don't see a
strong need to patch the code to make this a 100% invariable rule. (Of
course, someone else may disagree, which is fine.)

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Tselebrovskiy
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations
Next
From: Álvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: misleading error message in ProcessUtilitySlow T_CreateStatsStmt