Re: [DESIGN] ParallelAppend - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [DESIGN] ParallelAppend
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaCordqW=_QVoaUw_GhQ3kpt4bPTrhvbpxGu1eT4AP5LQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DESIGN] ParallelAppend  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [DESIGN] ParallelAppend  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> Without this patch, that 0.5 (or 50% of leaders effort) is considered for
> Gather node irrespective of the number of workers or other factors, but
> I think with Patch that is no longer true and that's what I am worrying
> about.

Nope, that patch does not change that at all.  We probably should, but
this patch does not.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: custom function for converting human readable sizes to bytes
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches