Re: Better way of dealing with pgstat wait timeout during buildfarm runs? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Better way of dealing with pgstat wait timeout during buildfarm runs?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaApmPth0mdVJBo7JWxnEPod8t1UsNZo3HmJMyPxOmNNg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Better way of dealing with pgstat wait timeout during buildfarm runs?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> This would have the effect of transferring all responsibility for
>>> dead-stats-entry cleanup to autovacuum.  For ordinary users, I think
>>> that'd be just fine.  It might be less fine though for people who
>>> disable autovacuum, if there still are any.
>
>> -1.  I don't think it's a good idea to inflict pain on people who want
>> to schedule their vacuums manually (and yes, there are some) to get
>> clean buildfarm runs.
>
> Did you read the rest of it?

Yeah...  since when do I not read your emails?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: orangutan seizes up during isolation-check
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}