Re: ddd - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: ddd
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaATbCPrzkPWCatGZuOOGis_h-8VwAK9Pbgv4tkG4qwrg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to ddd  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: force parallel mode vs CTAS
Re: ddd
List pgsql-hackers
Great subject line!

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I think both I and commit e9baa5e9fa147e are confused.
>
> By my reading this is the fault of e9baa5e9fa147e [3]. Robert, Haribabu
> any idea?

If I run the regression tests with force_parallel_mode=on prior to the
parallel hash join patch, they pass.  If I run them now, they fail
inside the parallel hash join tests here:

create table wide as select generate_series(1, 2) as id, rpad('',
320000, 'x') as t;

I'm guessing that test case would have failed before, too, but we
didn't have it.  I'll analyze this further in a bit.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Todd A. Cook"
Date:
Subject: Re: force parallel mode vs CTAS
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench