Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Robert Haas
Subject Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa9r0Yf0cqsTP1i+UDGDRbUQ-MUktV-PwcThL954dcSYA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
List pgsql-www
Is anyone else getting these?  I'm getting these for many of my -hackers posts.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@mail>
Date: Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
To: robertmhaas@gmail.com


This is the mail system at host mail.zehome.com.

I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.

For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.

If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
                  The mail system

<ed@zehome.com>: mail forwarding loop for ed@zehome.com

Final-Recipient: rfc822; ed@zehome.com
Original-Recipient: rfc822;ed@zehome.com
Action: failed
Status: 4.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; mail forwarding loop for ed@zehome.com


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development
<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 13:25:17 -0400
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] space reserved for WAL record does not match
what was written: panic on windows
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Could it be that MAXALIGN/TYPEALIGN doesn't really work for values
> bigger than 32bit?
>
> #define MAXALIGN(LEN)                   TYPEALIGN(MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF, (LEN))
> #define TYPEALIGN(ALIGNVAL,LEN)  \
>         (((intptr_t) (LEN) + ((ALIGNVAL) - 1)) & ~((intptr_t) ((ALIGNVAL) - 1)))

Isn't the problem, more specifically, that it doesn't work for values
larger than an intptr_t?

And does that indicate that intptr_t is the wrong type to be using here?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: NC Triangle PUG mailing list
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender