Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa8LjfJgVH8f2CDzViDSxempsf5td5020bSPJYFptE0tg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Petr Jelinek
<petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Is there anything stopping anyone from implementing it?
>
> No, just didn't seem priority for the functionality right now.

Why is it OK for this to not support rename like everything else does?It shouldn't be more than a few hours of work to
fixthat, and I
 
think leaving stuff like that out just because it's a lower priority
is fairly short-sighted.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Clarifying "server starting" messaging in pg_ctlstart without --wait
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Clarifying "server starting" messaging in pg_ctlstart without --wait