Re: dropping datumSort field - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: dropping datumSort field
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa8LfaoXG8+A1G_nE+xC-FO3Lzm=es0S8bWS5RiPjwj=A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: dropping datumSort field  (Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>)
Responses Re: dropping datumSort field
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 11:16 AM Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com> wrote:
> tupDesc is declared inside `if (!node->sort_Done)` block whereas the last reference to tupDesc is outside the if
block.

Yep.

> I take your review comment and will go back to do more homework.

The real point for me here is you haven't offered any reason to make
this change. The structure member in question is basically free.
Because of alignment padding it uses no more memory, and it makes the
intent of the code clearer.

Let's not change things just because we could.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zhihong Yu
Date:
Subject: Re: dropping datumSort field
Next
From: Junwang Zhao
Date:
Subject: remove useless comments