Re: [PATCH] Change "checkpoint starting" message to use "wal" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [PATCH] Change "checkpoint starting" message to use "wal"
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa8EFV0BnOrvHMJBLTsOUeVcFK6ftbJHdea9iRdJFM1NQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Change "checkpoint starting" message to use "wal"  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Change "checkpoint starting" message to use "wal"  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 4:10 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:04:12AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > There's hundreds of other internal uses of xlog that were not touched
> > either, only the user-facing parts were changed.
>
> I have heard of them ;)
> Just wondering if this one is worth renaming as the variable is
> isolated.  It is not a big deal to do nothing though.

Well, if we rename the user-visible part but not the internal part,
then they don't match, which is odd.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support