Re: [PATCH] Add transforms feature - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [PATCH] Add transforms feature
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa7kVGdrFg2s29sp8TgZQzr=rfTq3kaJRq2bfn+AMSNKQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Add transforms feature  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>> 4. Why guc-use-transforms? Is there some possible negative side effect
>> of transformations, so we have to disable it? If somebody don't would to
>> use some transformations, then he should not to install some specific
>> transformation.
>
> Well, there was extensive discussion last time around where people
> disagreed with that assertion.

I think we need to the ability to control it per-function, but having
a global disabling knob on top of that doesn't seem especially useful.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: pgbench - merging transaction logs
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit