Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa7earMWXrqfhfPFMU+O+-ObnvNUdB2UBvQfft_sPrXfA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Responses Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote:
> Also, we've faced issues in the past with making catalog changes due to fear
> of breaking user scripts. Instead of doubling down on that with RLS on top
> of catalog tables, would it be better to move the tables to a different
> schema, make them accessible only to superusers and put views in pg_catalog?

Uggh.  -1 on that option from me.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jesper Pedersen
Date:
Subject: Re: Additional LWLOCK_STATS statistics
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS