Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa6hekDGenr29TG_K4bH7rxLEM9RU+5KDAiY+SiAsFhew@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> I'm personally kind of astonished that we're even thinking about beta
>> so soon.  I mean, we at least need to go through the stuff listed
>> here, I think:
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items
>
> Well, maybe we ought to call it an alpha not a beta, but I think we ought
> to put out some kind of release that we can encourage people to test.
> What you are suggesting is that we serialize resolution of the known
> issues with discovery of new issues, and that's not an efficient use of
> time.  Especially seeing that we're approaching the summer season where
> we won't get much input at all.

Well, I think we ought to take at least a few weeks to try to do a bit
of code review and clean up what we can from the open items list.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely