Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa5WEYWM98OjY8LC=p8O+S+ERvcv6PVmgQA7O4ScRRRPg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 3:26 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Oh.  That's easily removed.  Though I have to say that other people said
> that they liked it so much that they would have liked to have it in the
> original VACUUM one too (5ba2b281-9c84-772a-cf37-17780d782936@lab.ntt.co.jp).

Huh.  Well, that's another option, but then what do we do if the
number of phases is not a constant?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Removed unused variable, openLogOff.