Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Bug in to_timestamp().
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa4FVrCikyOVGVF6HqGZ92CrkBodDnm4SCeC-o2OiHWrg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in to_timestamp().  (amul sul <sul_amul@yahoo.co.in>)
Responses Re: Bug in to_timestamp().  (amul sul <sul_amul@yahoo.co.in>)
Re: Bug in to_timestamp().  (Artur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:35 AM, amul sul <sul_amul@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> Hmm. I haven't really looked into the code, but with applying both patches it looks precisely imitate Oracle's
behaviour.Thanks.
 

This is good to hear, but for us to consider applying something like
this, somebody would need to look into the code pretty deeply.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Use pread and pwrite instead of lseek + write and read
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: [Patch] New psql prompt substitution %r (m = master, r = replica)