Re: [HACKERS] Potential data loss of 2PC files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Potential data loss of 2PC files
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa1isBSoDLPR7mfDhKBnFfLDpkd6MPFmyL84tQo67fGEA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Potential data loss of 2PC files  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Potential data loss of 2PC files
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> It makes more sense of you mentally separate between filename(s) and file contents.  Having to do filesystem metatata
transactionsfor an fsync intended to sync contents would be annoying...
 

I thought that's why there's fdatasync.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Potential data loss of 2PC files
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement table partitioning.