Re: plpgsql extension install nitpick - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: plpgsql extension install nitpick
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa-QUoT1sA6Qof+Uqpy52mmzh9fDPg2JVDOSHtmmnhNnw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plpgsql extension install nitpick  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: plpgsql extension install nitpick
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> On lör, 2011-07-02 at 23:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> [ don't want to put duplicate comments on PLs and their extensions ]
>
>> Well, you still write functions in the language and refer to it in the
>> SQL commands, so it is reasonable to know about the language as opposed
>> to the extension it is in.  You wouldn't remove man pages just because
>> an RPM package description exists.
>
> Well, if I'm in the minority I'll yield gracefully.  Anybody else have
> an opinion?

I don't see any harm in commenting it in both places.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Deriving release notes from git commit messages