Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZzHSx0UOAHRXWX04_NRC-xyjDrF+JJNZh72tesxyjknw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 12:46 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Only if either the user wants to drop all stats, or somehow knows the oids of
> already dropped tables...

If it's really true that we can end up storing data for dropped
objects, I think that's not acceptable and needs to be fixed.

I don't currently understand the other issues on this thread well
enough to have a clear opinion on them.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoid erroring out when unable to remove or parse logical rewrite files to save checkpoint work