Re: Naming of pg_checksums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Naming of pg_checksums
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZyvqSyQ6FvH5vC=SmNgbfgvTJCFqMKYPTxn0TqdNA5yg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Naming of pg_checksums  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 1:56 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Is there a reason pg_checksums is plural and not singular, i.e.,
> pg_checksum?  I know it is being renamed for PG 12.  It might have
> needed to be plural when it was pg_verify_checksums.

That is a good question, IMHO.  I am not sure whether pg_checksum is
better, but I'm pretty sure it's not worse.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: make \d pg_toast.foo show its indices
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: make \d pg_toast.foo show its indices