Re: When to drop src/tools/msvc support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: When to drop src/tools/msvc support
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZwJ09Aw_igiLV7J-OPikii5PyW_iJyXCFtS1MdcY7hJQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: When to drop src/tools/msvc support  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: When to drop src/tools/msvc support  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:56 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > However, if this is the direction we're going, we probably need to
> > give pgsql-packagers a heads up ASAP, because anybody who is still
> > relying on the MSVC system to build Windows binaries is presumably
> > going to need some time to adjust. If we rip out the build system
> > somebody is using a couple of weeks before beta, that might make it
> > difficult for that person to get the beta out promptly. And I think
> > there's probably more than just EDB who would be in that situation.
>
> Oh ... that's a good point.  Is there anyone besides EDB shipping
> MSVC-built executables?  Would it even be practical to switch to
> meson with a month-or-so notice?  Seems kind of tight, and it's
> not like the packagers volunteered to make this switch.

I can't really speak to those questions with confidence.

Perhaps instead of telling pgsql-packagers what we're doing, we could
instead ask them if it would work for them if we did XYZ. Then we
could use that information to inform our decision-making.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: When to drop src/tools/msvc support
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port to listen