On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 10:22 AM Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote:
> I'd argue this is exactly what I mean by "this system has a problem".
> Telling the user about that makes sense.
That's a fair position.
> > cautious about this than most people on this thread: log_checkpoints
> > won't generate more than a few lines of output per checkpoint
> > interval, and a checkpoint cycle will be on the order of minutes, so
> > it's really never that much volume. On the other hand, in theory, this
> > setting can generate arbitrarily many messages.
>
> Well, it's still limited by 1 message per second (times
> max_connections). It won't suddenly fill up the server with 1000
> messages per second.
You make it sound like running with max_connections=5000 is a bad idea.
(That was a joke, but yes, people actually do this, and no, it doesn't go well.)
> The log volume is the lesser of the problems. Not printing the message
> just because the system does have a problem isn't the right fix.
Yeah.
> Let's fix the default. People who have a problem can still disable it,
> but then everyone else gets the useful messages in the first iteration.
Reasonable.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
