Re: VACUUM memory management - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: VACUUM memory management
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZw8RSFpDYEnMwxwqkAOo7=yaXFYfF+W5f3tKQXZuBCOg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: VACUUM memory management  (Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: VACUUM memory management  (Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 2:02 PM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Did you see this thread?
>> https://postgr.es/m/CAGTBQpbDCaR6vv9=scXzuT8fSbckf=a3NgZdWFWZbdVugVht6Q@mail.gmail.com
>>
> Yes, and somehow did what is explained.

Did you modify Claudio's patch or write a totally new one? In either
case, why did you choose that approach? If you wrote a totally new
one, have you compared your work with Claudio's, to see if he covered
anything you might need to cover? Please explain why your patch is
better/different than his.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM memory management
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: error context for vacuum to include block number