On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 12:27 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Nah, it's so close to ereport that it looks like a typo. eseterr isn't
> > awful, perhaps. Or maybe errXXXX, but I've not thought of suitable XXXX.
>
> ... "errsave", maybe?
eseterr or errsave seem totally fine to me, FWIW.
I would probably choose a more verbose name if I were doing it, but I
do get the point that keeping line lengths reasonable is important,
and if someone were to accuse me of excessive prolixity, I would be
unable to mount much of a defense.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
