Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZuA=Fb26D36v3eErWRJXLXJTejO=c=jF36R4T0NPaheA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks  (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
Responses Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:
> And, also I added regression test cases to detect these code paths,
> because some of object types does not cover the case when it was
> dropped.

These regression tests seem busted to me.  First, I applied the part 2
patch.  The regression tests failed.  Then, I applied the part 3
patch.  Then they passed.  So far so good.  Then, I took the
regression test portion of the part 2 and part 3 patches and applied
just those.  That also fails.

Can we come up with a set of regression tests that:

- passes on unmodified master
- still passes with the part 2 patch applied
- also passes with both the part 2 and part 3 patches applied

AIUI, this patch isn't supposed to be changing any behavior, just
consolidating the code.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Florian Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in walsender when calling out to do_pg_stop_backup (and others?)
Next
From: Greg Jaskiewicz
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in walsender when calling out to do_pg_stop_backup (and others?)