Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidaeis *still* broken) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidaeis *still* broken)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZu80Sg2_P45Ort5yXwQe+t5NA=+JsBUEyqCue-sBDjgQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidaeis *still* broken)  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> I would definitely suggest putting it in HEAD (and thus, v10) for a while to
> get some real world exposure before backpatching. But if it does work out
> well in the end, then we can certainly consider backpatching it. But given
> the difficulty in reliably reproducing the problem etc, I think it's a good
> idea to give it some proper real world experience in 10 first.

So, are you going to, perhaps, commit this?  Or who is picking this up?

/me knows precious little about Windows.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_class.relpartbound definition overly brittle