Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZtsZLMd8ku2fwjf=B9Txz8CKCLNkbmz1yzMy7CMU_eEg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Yes, my concern here is how many column we can allow in a stats
> view. I think I'm a bit too warried about that.

I think that's a good thing to worry about.   In the past, Tom has
expressed reluctance to make stats tables that have a row per table
any wider at all, IIRC.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: default range partition and constraint exclusion
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE ofpartition key