Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZtkW0YxsrkCXh=bPFh2u3=GeFVvH2jHEO6o+ureQ03jQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> - Rename them, hard break is OK: Michael P, Bruce, Stephen (depends on
> David's input),  Magnus

I'm in favor of this.  But I don't like Peter's proposal to use a more
complicated structure.  As for the new names, how about pg_wal and
pg_xact?  I don't think "pg_trans" is as good; is it transactional or
transient or transport or transitive or what?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog
Next
From: "Daniel Verite"
Date:
Subject: Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog