Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZsRi5fO4ByCT3Z2-koUSveubj_awQSDVaa-ELs4wXixw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Instead, what I propose (and is not really in the patch), as a
> backpatchable item, is an approach in which the functions to compute
> each rel's Browne strength and sort are hooks.  Normal behavior is not
> to sort at all, as currently, and sites that have a problem with the
> current random order can install a custom module that provide hooks to
> change ordering as they see fit.  So behavior won't change for people
> who have no problem today.

Can you think of any examples of cases where we have back-patched a new hook?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables