Re: Request to add options to tools/git_changelog - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Request to add options to tools/git_changelog
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZomQJSJTrShpWZG=n_WEL7LUaP+T_yHNtebozWSQXqyw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Request to add options to tools/git_changelog  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Request to add options to tools/git_changelog  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> I agree adding rarely-used options to a tool doesn't make sense, but the
>> question is what percentage of the git_changelog userbase am I?
>
> 50% I think.  The only thing that's really concerning me here is that
> the reverse-sort option seems likely to be bug-inducing, and I really
> don't grasp that it has real value.  But whatever.

He can't be more than 33% I think, since I use it regularly as well.  :-)

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Future In-Core Replication
Next
From: Jameison Martin
Date:
Subject: Re: patch submission: truncate trailing nulls from heap rows to reduce the size of the null bitmap