Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: auto_explain sample rate - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: auto_explain sample rate
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZoRunWtv8zHiKUgmv193h0m40JXKY4i-SALgCk91MSUg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: auto_explain sample rate  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: auto_explain sample rate  (Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> A bit late, but I think we should rename the GUC variable to
> "sampling_rate" (instead of sample_ratio) as that's what pgbench uses
> for the same thing. That'd be more consistent.

I like that idea.  It seems like slightly better terminology.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Inconsistent error handling in START_REPLICATION command
Next
From: Vitaly Burovoy
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATH] Correct negative/zero year in to_date/to_timestamp