On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Daniel Verite <daniel@manitou-mail.org> wrote:
>> But worse than either of those things, there is no real
>> agreement on what the overall design of this feature
>> should be.
>
> The part in the design that raised concerns upthread is
> essentially how headers sorting is exposed to the user and
> implemented.
>
> As suggested in [1], I've made some drastic changes in the
> attached patch to take the comments (from Dean R., Tom L.)
> into account.
> [ ... lengthy explanation ... ]
> - also NULLs are no longer excluded from headers, per Peter E.
> comment in [2].
Dean, Tom, Peter, what do you think of the new version?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
