Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZmBpkeU_=xM3EPBVRmRdRBy_jVGYFQ3_XL7CO6SeEfWQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> To put this in another light, had this issue been brought up post
> feature-freeze, your definition would mean that we would only have the
> option to either revert the patch entirely or to live with the poor
> naming scheme.

Yeah, and I absolutely agree with that.  In fact, I think it's
*already* past the time when we should be considering the changes you
want.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Transaction traceability - txid_status(bigint)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix and simplify check forwhether we're running as Windows serv