Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZkCfjoCM66hzGFH4Lo2mG05P7AFLX8uZkw0pJy5oeLFg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> The only actual separate patch since then (fastgetattr as inline
> function) was posted 2015-08-05 and I yesterday suggested to push it
> today. And it's just replacing two existing macros by inline functions.

I'm a little concerned about that one.  Your testing shows that's a
win for you, but is it a win for everyone?  Maybe we should go ahead
and do it anyway, but I'm not sure.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: SCRAM authentication
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6