Re: Lowering temp_buffers minimum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Lowering temp_buffers minimum
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZjOn8WOtvptrBfoPufKs1mKmyWcNbC9EOVz1XXwK7n7w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Lowering temp_buffers minimum  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 9:33 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Does anybody see a reason we shouldn't lower temp_buffers to match
> shared_buffers?

I do not see any such reason. I'd say go for it.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alex Friedman
Date:
Subject: Re: Doc: clarify possibility of ephemeral discrepancies between state and wait_event in pg_stat_activity
Next
From: James Hunter
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: "query_work_mem" GUC, to distribute working memory to the query's individual operators