On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>> Well, if we apply this, it has the possibility to break existing
>>>>> dumps.
>>
>> BTW, it occurs to me that we could dodge that objection, with much less
>> work than Robert suggests, if we just made the message be a WARNING not
>> an ERROR. I think that'd do just as well in terms of what the message
>> could usefully accomplish, ie, steer people away from doing things that
>> won't work. Still not sure that it's worth doing though,
>>
>
> i'm fine with a WARNING
Me too; I suggested it before (so did you).
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
