On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> But in any case, my objection is that there's no adequate use-case
> for this GUC, because it's much more sensible to set it from the client
> side. We have too many GUCs already --- Josh B regularly goes on the
> warpath looking for ones we can remove. This one should never get in
> there to start with.
Of course, we also have no shortage of connection parameters.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
