Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZfvQiUSnNDYgnZgHqDD0hEgdcO4nFwN833ipZeNbhkng@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions  (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Attached is a quick sketch of how this could perhaps be done (ignoring
> for the moment the relatively-boring opclass pushups).

Here it is with some relatively-boring opclass pushups added.  I just
did the int4 bit; the same thing will need to be done, uh, 35 more
times.  But you get the gist.  No, not that kind of gist.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: ICU collation variant keywords and pg_collationentries (Was: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages