Re: [HACKERS] intermittent failures in Cygwin from select_parallel tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] intermittent failures in Cygwin from select_parallel tests
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZew=g0KXTQa+6Xe4fV31t4oBjsnBJX56PPopj1bvf77Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] intermittent failures in Cygwin from select_parallel tests  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] intermittent failures in Cygwin from select_parallel tests  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 6:36 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think so because this problem has been reported previously as
> well [1][2] even before the commit in question.
>
> [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1ce5a19f-3b1d-bb1c-4561-0158176f65f1%40dunslane.net
> [2] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/25861.1472215822%40sss.pgh.pa.us

Oh, good point.  So this is a longstanding bug that has possibly just
gotten easier to hit.

I still think figuring out what's going on with the
ParallelWorkerNumbers is a good plan.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Server ignores contents of SASLInitialResponse