Re: force parallel mode vs CTAS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: force parallel mode vs CTAS
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZdGT56-+9FqZ3T2nnwhcwmqePSwsdqt+vHDHE+TTUoLQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: force parallel mode vs CTAS  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: force parallel mode vs CTAS  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> Great subject line!
>
> fixed ...

Ack, sorry, I replied on the original thread, not realizing there was
a second one.  Basically, I think the assertion is wrong-headed and
can be adjusted so it doesn't fail, and I attached a patch over there.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: != should give error?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning