On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 7:50 AM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
> I like this refactoring, but while it's rather mechanical, it's pretty
> large, so I think it's too late to do the refactoring at this time
> just before the beta 2 release. So I'd vote for going with your
> v1-0001 and v1-0002 and doing the refactoring in v20. As mentioned by
> Robert, I don't think it's good to call LOCAL_FCINFO() in
> import_relation_statistics() and import_attribute_statistics() to call
> the guts of those functions either, but that is *consistent* with the
> existing way pg_restore_relation_stats() and
> pg_restore_attribute_stats() do that, so that is actually not that
> bad. Also, as you mentioned above, it's inefficient for the new API
> functions to lock an already-locked relation, and validate an
> already-validated attname/attnum, but I think it would be negligible.
Fujita-san, is it then your plan to get those two patches committed?
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
