Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZd4mrKTwJrHJOjm9CUMwnao-1imHkvat=YAO=HiWHYeQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Singular point contribution is not the point of my argument. My point is
> that if three people from EDB and three people from Citus got together and
> worked on a project in full collaboration it would be more beneficial to the
> project.

Well, the scalability work in 9.6 went almost exactly like this,
assuming you count Andres as three people (which is entirely
reasonable) and Dilip, Mithun, Amit, and myself as three people (which
is maybe less reasonable, since I don't really want any of us counted
as less than a whole person).

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: 10.0
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 10.0