Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ_2j6n8BgRtSfJkh6_CSC8kJJabJ2Wh1pX+rmUEdURRg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> Also, as Tom pointed out, at some point we have to either say we really
> support overloading or we don't.

We clearly do support overloading.  I don't think that's at issue.
But as we all know, using it can cause formerly unambiguous queries to
become ambiguous and stop working.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: Record comparison compiler warning